6 Responses for "Palin fires back on “Troopergate”"

1. Mari September 16th, 2008 at 12:10 pm 1

   Have fun trying to keep flogging this dead horse, dnc hacks. Your own candidate wouldn’t hold up if a lot of his past was brought into sharper focus.

2. zeitgeist September 17th, 2008 at 3:17 pm 2

   I think she had great reason to want him fired and I’m sure that will come out, but I do wonder about the way she’s gone about it: “I welcome the investigation and will cooperate in any way…” etc, then “Since I haven’t actually been subpoenaed, I’m not going near it.” I guess its like the “thanks, no thanks” on the bridge, which is true insofar as she said thanks and took the money, then decided not to build it, but kept the money for other infrastructure projects (which is fine, but she should endeavor to be a tad more honest about how it went down).

3. Ian S. September 17th, 2008 at 3:40 pm 3

   She’s a lot busier now than she was earlier in the investigation

4. zeitgeist September 17th, 2008 at 3:55 pm 4

   Well, their mistake was in not subpoenaing her, I guess They already made an agreement with her not to release the results before the election, though, so its not like she’s not getting that “deference” the McCain campaign says she so desperately needs. I call bs, she can take whatever anyone dishes out to her and they should stop coddling her. They have a strong candidate in the VP and they’re afraid to let her actually make her case(s).

5. Ian S. September 17th, 2008 at 3:57 pm 5

   I agree – as with Obama, the campaign is hobbling the candidate.

6. zeitgeist September 17th, 2008 at 4:18 pm 6

   See? We always get there eventually